ISACA themselves released a macro-enabled Excel tool back in 2019/2020, but the fixed dozens of formula errors.
Teams can modify formulas, weigh specific governance components, and alter visual dashboards.
A maturity assessment is not a one-time project. It is an ongoing cycle of measurement and optimization. To maximize the value of your COBIT 2019 assessment tool, establish it as a core component of your annual corporate governance cycle. cobit 2019 maturity assessment tool xls 2021 top
Eliminates the licensing fees associated with enterprise Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) software.
Use the COBIT 2019 Design Factors to set realistic target capability levels (typically level 2 or 3 for standard enterprises, and level 4 or 5 for highly regulated or tech-reliant industries). ISACA themselves released a macro-enabled Excel tool back
In 2021, the landscape for Excel-based COBIT 2019 assessments focused on two main areas: official design toolkits and community-driven process templates.
[Phase 1: Scope Definition] ➔ [Phase 2: Data Gathering] ➔ [Phase 3: Scoring & Input] ➔ [Phase 4: Gap Analysis] ➔ [Phase 5: Roadmap Creation] Phase 1: Define the Scope using Design Factors It is an ongoing cycle of measurement and optimization
COBIT 2019 evolved from traditional maturity models by adopting a highly structured Capability Rating system. This system is heavily influenced by the CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) framework and the ISO/IEC 33020 international standard for process assessment. Capability Levels vs. Maturity Levels
Unlike older versions, the 2019 toolkit uses "Design Factors" (e.g., enterprise strategy, risk profile) to weight which of the 40 governance and management objectives are most critical for your specific organization. Capability vs. Maturity:
COBIT 2019 shifted from the older Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) approach used in COBIT 5 to a more refined model. Capability vs. Maturity